🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about industry interference with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global suggested parameters”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

The WHO in fact recommends a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “black market” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We live in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Further, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.